Table 9.
P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for FokI Ff polymorphism respectively.
Study | Intervention | Controls | Odds ratio | 95% CI | z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 | 49/107 | 56/103 | 0.709 | 0.412–1.221 | ||
Tatijana Semunik 2005 | 63/132 | 136/232 | 0.645 | 0.419–0.991 | ||
J J San Pedro 2005 | 35/71 | 39/88 | 1.222 | 0.652–2.287 | ||
C Panierakis 2009 | 31/100 | 43/96 | 0.554 | 0.309–0.993 | ||
Greear R M 2013 | 21/55 | 22/50 | 0.786 | 0.361–1.714 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 199/465 | 296/569 | 0.724 | 0.564–0.929 | −2.538 | 0.011 |
Total (random effects) | 199/465 | 296/569 | 0.723 | 0.563–0.929 | −2.535 | 0.011 |
Q | 3.8098 | |||||
DF | 4 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.4324 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 0.00% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 0.00–79.45 |
Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = −0.4 P = 0.4833 (low power); Egger: bias = 1.95378 (95% CI = 5.613844–9.521404) P = 0.4715; Harbord–Egger: bias = 2.01803 (92.5% CI = −4.313428 to 8.349488) P = 0.4557.
DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.