Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;6(3):159–171. doi: 10.1530/EC-16-0110

Table 9.

P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for FokI Ff polymorphism respectively.

Study Intervention Controls Odds ratio 95% CI z P
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 49/107 56/103 0.709 0.412–1.221
Tatijana Semunik 2005 63/132 136/232 0.645 0.419–0.991
J J San Pedro 2005 35/71 39/88 1.222 0.652–2.287
C Panierakis 2009 31/100 43/96 0.554 0.309–0.993
Greear R M 2013 21/55 22/50 0.786 0.361–1.714
Total (fixed effects) 199/465 296/569 0.724 0.564–0.929 −2.538 0.011
Total (random effects) 199/465 296/569 0.723 0.563–0.929 −2.535 0.011
Q 3.8098
DF 4
Significance level P = 0.4324
I2 (inconsistency) 0.00%
95% CI for I2 0.00–79.45

Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = −0.4 P = 0.4833 (low power); Egger: bias = 1.95378 (95% CI = 5.613844–9.521404) P = 0.4715; Harbord–Egger: bias = 2.01803 (92.5% CI = −4.313428 to 8.349488) P = 0.4557.

DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.