Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Neural Comput. 2017 Jan 17;29(3):603–642. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00936

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Results of the estimation methods for the spring-mass model. (a) The ground-truth matrix. (b) The estimated connection matrix from the correlation method (16% error). (c) The estimated connection matrix from the inverse covariance method (53% error). (d) The estimated connection matrix from the SRPM method (0% error). In panels a–d, black denotes either a diagonal element or a connectivity between two masses via a spring, and white denotes no connectivity.