Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;4(2):025503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.025503

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) Bar graphs of the difference in AUC scores achieved by the saliency models for faculty and for fellows. Each of the saliency models achieved a positive ΔAUC, suggesting that the saliency models may be more effectively in predicting faculty’ eye-movements than fellows’. (b) Rank orders of the saliency models with respect to each of the six radiologists. Certain saliency models may perform well for some radiologists than others.