. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2016 Nov 9;93:217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.001

Table 4.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Experiment 2

	R²	ΔR²	b	*SE_b*	B
*Model 1A: Age & OR*
Step 1:	.072	.072⁺
Age (in months)			.049	.025	.269⁺
Step 2:	.243	.171^*
Age (in months)			.014	.025	.077
OR Task (raw score)			.322	.096	.455^*
*Model 1B: Age & WR*
Step 1:	.072	.072⁺
Age (in months)			.049	.025	.269⁺
Step 2:
Age (in months)	.246	.174^*
WR Task (raw score)			.038	.023	.206
			.441	.130	.422^*
*Model 1C: Age & WOB*
Step 1:	.072	.072⁺
Age (in months)			.049	.025	.269⁺
Step 2:	.310	.282^*
Age (in months)			.011	.023	.060
WOB Task (raw score)			.437	.106	.530^*
*Model 2: OR, WR & WOB*
Step 1:
WOB Task (raw score)	.307	.307^*
			.457	.096	.554^*
Step 2:	.433	.126^*
OR Task (raw score)			.182	.087	.258^*
WR Task (raw score)			.275	.121	.263^*
WOB Task (raw score)			.280	.104	.339^*
*Model 3: Age, OR, WR & WOB*
Step 1:	.072	.072⁺
Age (in months)			.049	.025	.269⁺
Step 2:	.433	.361^*
Age (in months)			−.003	.023	−.016
OR Task			.186	.092	.263^*
WR Task			.274	.122	.263^*
WOB Task			.283	.109	.343^*

Note.

indicates p < .05

⁺

indicates .05 < p < .10.

Predictor variable in all models: Performance on CSWL task.