Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;20(2):396–419. doi: 10.1007/s10683-016-9488-x

Table 3.

Tobit regression of message classification on perceived cues

Dependent variable:
frequency considered as promise
(1) (2)
Mention of money .03
(.06)
.03
(.06)
Mention of we/us .04
(.06)
.07
(.06)
Word count .008***
(.003)
.008***
(.003)
Male −.09
(.06)
No. of observation 80 79a

Robust Standard errors are reported in parentheses

*, **, *** Correspond to 1, 5 and 10 % significance level, respectively

aWe lose one observation by adding male as a regressor, because one of the message sender indicates that he/she is bi-gender