Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;2017:1391843. doi: 10.1155/2017/1391843

Table 2.

Association between embolic stroke patterns and the diagnosis of embolic stroke of undetermined source at baseline (n = 127).

Embolic stroke pattern ESUS (n = 26) No-ESUS (n = 101) OR (95% CI) p value
Multiple acute infarcts (n, %) 11 (42.3) 46 (45.5) 0.88 (0.37–2.10) 0.767
Simultaneous involvement of different circulations (n, %) 8 (30.8) 39 (38.6) 0.71 (0.28–1.78) 0.461
Multiple infarcts of different ages (n, %) 11 (42.3) 26 (25.7) 2.11 (0.86–5.18) 0.102
Isolated cortical ischemia (n, %) 4 (15.4) 11 (10.9) 1.49 (0.43–5.12) 0.529
At least one embolic stroke pattern (n, %) 16 (61.5) 51 (50.5) 1.57 (0.65–3.79) 0.317

ESUS: embolic stroke of undetermined source; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.