Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;107(6):853–857. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303813

TABLE 2—

Results of Indicator Validation by Comparing NYC Macroscope 2013 (n = 648 816) with NYC HANES 2013–2014 (n = 1135) and the 2013 Community Health Survey (n = 6166) for NYC Adults in Care in the Past Year

Indicator
Hypertension Diabetes Smoking Obesity Hypercholesterolemia Depression Influenza Vaccination
NYC Macroscope, % (95% CI) 32.3 (32.2, 32.4) 13.9 (13.8, 14.0) 15.2 (15.1, 15.3) 27.9 (27.7, 27.9) 49.3 (49.1, 49.5) 8.2 (8.1, 8.2) 20.9 (20.8, 21.0)
NYC HANES, % (95% CI) 32.5 (29.4, 35.7) 12.6 (10.6, 14.8) 17.7 (15.1, 20.8) 31.3 (28.5, 34.5) 46.9 (42.6, 51.3) 19.0 (16.4, 21.9) 47.6 (44.0, 51.3)
Community Health Survey, % (95% CI) 31.6 (30.2, 33.0) 12.5 (11.5, 13.6) 14.9 (13.6, 16.3) 24.7 (23.2, 26.3) 47.9 (45.7, 50.1) NA 47.3 (45.5, 49.0)
NYC Macroscope vs NYC HANES
 Absolute difference < 5 ✓ (0.15) ✓ (1.36) ✓ (2.55) ✓ (3.46) ✓ (2.36) X (10.80) X (26.71)
 Prevalence ratio of 0.85–1.15 ✓(1.00) ✓ (1.11) ✓ (0.86) ✓ (0.89) ✓ (1.05) X (0.43) X (0.44)
 Test of difference (t test), P ≥ .05 ✓(P = .93) ✓ (P = .19) ✓ (P = .08) X (P = .02) ✓ (P = .29) X (P < .01) X (P < .01)
 Test of equivalence, P < .05 ✓ (P < .01) ✓ (P < .001) ✓ (P = .04) X (P = .14) X (P = .12) X (P = .99) X (P = .99)
 Recommendation Ready for use Ready for use Ready for use Ready for use Use with cautiona Not ready for use Not ready for use

Note. ✓ = criterion met; X = criterion not met; CI = confidence interval; HANES = Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NA = not available in this data set; NYC = New York City.

a

Caution for hypercholesterolemia prevalence is on the basis of the tests shown here and lower sensitivity and specify in the chart review study (data not shown).