Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;2017:1423683. doi: 10.1155/2017/1423683

Table 2.

Comparison of HMGB1 and other biomarkers.

IgG
response
CTL
response
Epitope
spreading
MDSC
increase
SAA
increase
CRP
increase
IL-6
increase
n = 39 n = 39 n = 39 n = 37 n = 39 n = 39 n = 39
n n n n n n n
HMGB1 increase (I) Yes 2 Yes 1 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 2
No 1 No 2 No 3 No 3 No 2 No 2 No 1
HMGB1 no change (NC) Yes 23 Yes 18 Yes 17 Yes 4 Yes 9 Yes 16 Yes 11
No 3 No 8 No 9 No 20 No 17 No 10 No 15
HMGB1 decrease (D) Yes 8 Yes 6 Yes 6 Yes 2 Yes 5 Yes 5 Yes 3
No 2 No 4 No 4 No 8 No 5 No 5 No 7
p value
 I versus not I (NC+D) 0.3698 0.2475 0.0307 0.4267 0.8493 0.4015 0.3473
 D versus not D (NC+I) 0.639 0.7538 0.939 0.7039 0.3844 0.6355 0.4111

MDSC
decrease
SAA
decrease
CRP
decrease
IL-6
decrease
n = 37 n = 39 n = 39 n = 39
n n n n

HMGB1 increase (I) Yes 1 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0
No 2 No 3 No 3 No 3
HMGB1 no change (NC) Yes 3 Yes 3 Yes 2 Yes 1
No 21 No 23 No 24 No 25
HMGB1 decrease (D) Yes 0 Yes 1 Yes 2 Yes 1
No 10 No 9 No 8 No 9
p value
 I versus not I (NC+D) 0.19 0.5422 0.5422 0.6751
 D versus not D (NC+I) 0.1975 0.9753 0.2389 0.418

p values of chi-square test are shown; statistically significant.