Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;20(5):832–847. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003013

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(colour online) Categories of carer-reported barriers to children’s fruit and vegetable consumption in urban/inner regional (urban/IR) and remote/outer regional (remote/OR) settings among families participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC), Wave 6, 2013 (N 1230). Responses were categorised as ‘Child dislike only’ (Inline graphic) if the only barrier the carer reported was that the child did not like fruit and/or vegetables; ‘Accessibility only’ (Inline graphic) if the carer only reported barriers related to accessibility and availability (too expensive, not available, poor quality, transport issues, and no storage); ‘Accessibility + child dislike’ (Inline graphic) if the carer reported children’s dislike and a barrier related to accessibility or availability; or ‘Other, don’t know or refused only’ (Inline graphic)