Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;20(5):832–847. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003013

Table 2.

Barriers to children’s fruit and vegetable consumption reported by carers in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC), Wave 6, 2013

Carer-reported barriers to children’s fruit and vegetable intake
Remote/OR Urban/IR Total
% n/N % n/N % n/N
No barriers to intake 51·9 136/262 55·7 539/968 54·9 675/1230
Children’s dislike 24·8 65/262 35·1 340/968 32·9 405/1230
Any accessibility barriers 24·0 63/262 2·9 28/968 7·4 91/1230
Too expensive 11·5 30/262 2·2 21/968 4·1 51/1230
Not available 13·7 36/262 ≤0·3 ≤3/968 ≤3·2 ≤39/1230
Poor quality 9·5 25/262 ≤0·3 ≤3/968 ≤2·3 ≤28/1230
Transport issues 1·5 4/262 0·5 5/968 0·7 9/1230
No preparation or storage area ≤1·1 ≤3/262 ≤0·3 ≤3/968 ≤0·5 ≤6/1230
Other 2·7 7/262 7·7 75/968 6·7 82/1230
Don’t know or refused ≤1·1 ≤3/262 2·7 26/968 ≤2·4 ≤29/1230

Remote/OR, remote/outer regional; urban/IR, urban/inner regional.

Carers who reported any barriers to their children’s fruit and vegetable intake were allowed to select up to two specific barriers from the provided response options. The table includes data on both of the carers’ responses if they reported two different barriers; thus, the sum of all responses sums to more than the total percentage reporting any barrier.