Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 8;10(2):143–147. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.00346

Table 2.

Association between uric acid tertile and high frequency hearing thresholds

Modela) Uric acid tertileb) High frequency hearing threshold
Low frequency hearing threshold
βc) (standard error) P-value P for trend βc) (standard error) P-value P for trend
Unadjusted T2 vs. T1 0.098 (0.012) <0.001 <0.001 0.031 (0.011) 0.005 <0.001
T3 vs. T1 0.149 (0.012) <0.001 0.063 (0.011) <0.001
Model 1 T2 vs. T1 -0.062 (0.028) 0.026 0.036 -0.056 (0.028) 0.046 0.080
T3 vs. T1 -0.067 (0.029) 0.023 -0.058 (0.030) 0.054
Model 2 T2 vs. T1 -0.068 (0.028) 0.014 0.007 -0.062 (0.028) 0.028 0.024
T3 vs. T1 -0.086 (0.030) 0.005 -0.074 (0.031) 0.017
Model 3 T2 vs. T1 -0.065 (0.028) 0.020 0.008 -0.065 (0.028) 0.023 0.024
T3 vs. T1 -0.084 (0.030) 0.005 -0.075 (0.031) 0.015

T1, ≤4.5; T2, 4.51–5.80; T3, >5.80.

a)

Adjusted covariates: Model 1=age, sex, race; Model 2=Model 1+(triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, systolic blood pressure); Model 3=Model 2+(history of smoking)+(heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, noise exposure).

b)

Subjects in the lowest tertile of uric acid were the reference group.

c)

Regression (β) coefficient can be elucidated as change of log-transformed mean high tone hearing thresholds comparing subjects in the upper 2 tertiles of serum uric acid to those in the lowest tertile.