Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1977 Oct;60(4):609–616. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.4.609

Thermal Energy Exchange Model and Water Loss of a Barrel Cactus, Ferocactus acanthodes1

Donald A Lewis a, Park S Nobel a
PMCID: PMC542674  PMID: 16660148

Abstract

The influences of various diurnal stomatal opening patterns, spines, and ribs on the stem surface temperature and water economy of a CAM succulent, the barrel cactus Ferocactus acanthodes, were examined using an energy budget model. To incorporate energy exchanges by shortwave and longwave irradiation, latent heat, conduction, and convection as well as the heat storage in the massive stem, the plant was subdivided into over 100 internal and external regions in the model. This enabled the average surface temperature to be predicted within 1 C of the measured temperature for both winter and summer days.

Reducing the stem water vapor conductance from the values observed in the field to zero caused the average daily stem surface temperature to increase only 0.7 C for a winter day and 0.3 C for a summer day. Thus, latent heat loss does not substantially reduce stem temperature. Although the surface temperatures averaged 18 C warmer for the summer day than for the winter day for a plant 41 cm tall, the temperature dependence of stomatal opening caused the simulated nighttime water loss rates to be about the same for the 2 days.

Spines moderated the amplitude of the diurnal temperature changes of the stem surface, since the daily variation was 17 C for the winter day and 25 C for the summer day with spines compared with 23 C and 41 C, respectively, in their simulated absence. Ribs reduced the daytime temperature rise by providing 54% more area for convective heat loss than for a smooth circumscribing surface. In a simulation where both spines and ribs were eliminated, the daytime average surface temperature rose by 5 C.

Full text

PDF
609

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gates D. M., Alderfer R., Taylor E. Leaf temperatures of desert plants. Science. 1968 Mar 1;159(3818):994–995. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3818.994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hadley N. F. Desert species and adaptation. Am Sci. 1972 May-Jun;60(3):338–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mitchell J. W. Heat transfer from spheres and other animal forms. Biophys J. 1976 Jun;16(6):561–569. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85711-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nobel P. S. Boundary layers of air adjacent to cylinders: estimation of effective thickness and measurements on plant material. Plant Physiol. 1974 Aug;54(2):177–181. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES