Table 1.
Study, year | 1. Well-defined study groups | 2. Selection bias adequately excluded | 3. Exposition well defined and adequate method of examination of the exposition | 4. Outcome well defined and adequate method of appraisal of the outcome | 5. Outcome defined blind before knowledge of the exposition | 6. Follow-up long enough | 7. Adequate exclusion of selective loss-to-follow-up | 8. Most important confounders or prognostic factors are known and taken into account in study design and analysis | Assessed quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adunsky [23] | Yes | Yes | No | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | No | Low |
Brouquet [20] | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Unclear | Yes | No | Low |
Marcantonio [7] | Yes | No | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Low |
Morrison [9] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | No | Unclear | Yes | Moderate |
Nandi [21] | Yes | No | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Low |
Shiiba [22] | Yes | Unclear | No | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | Low |