Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;34(6):437–443. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0455-9

Table 1.

Critical appraisal

Study, year 1. Well-defined study groups 2. Selection bias adequately excluded 3. Exposition well defined and adequate method of examination of the exposition 4. Outcome well defined and adequate method of appraisal of the outcome 5. Outcome defined blind before knowledge of the exposition 6. Follow-up long enough 7. Adequate exclusion of selective loss-to-follow-up 8. Most important confounders or prognostic factors are known and taken into account in study design and analysis Assessed quality
Adunsky [23] Yes Yes No Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear No Low
Brouquet [20] Yes Yes Yes No No Unclear Yes No Low
Marcantonio [7] Yes No No Yes Unclear Yes Yes No Low
Morrison [9] Yes Yes No Yes Unclear No Unclear Yes Moderate
Nandi [21] Yes No No No Unclear Yes Yes No Low
Shiiba [22] Yes Unclear No Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear No Low