Table 3.
Clinical case number | Correct valuesa | Number of raters selecting the correct rating | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total score | Rating | |||
1 | 11 | Probable | 10 | Average number of raters selecting “probable” correctly: 9.0 |
2 | 10 | 7 | ||
3 | 10 | 10 | ||
4 | 10 | 10 | ||
5 | 9 | 9 | ||
6 | 9 | 10 | ||
7 | 9 | 10 | ||
8 | 9 | 9 | ||
9 | 9 | 8 | ||
10 | 9 | 7 | ||
11 | 8 | Possible | 6 | Average number of raters selecting “possible” correctly: 7.9 |
12 | 8 | 8 | ||
13 | 8 | 9 | ||
14 | 8 | 7 | ||
15 | 7 | 6 | ||
16 | 7 | 9 | ||
17 | 7 | 7 | ||
18 | 7 | 9 | ||
19 | 7 | 8 | ||
20 | 7 | 10 | ||
21 | 6 | Unlikely | 9 | Average number of raters selecting “unlikely” correctly: 8.9 |
22 | 6 | 8 | ||
23 | 6 | 8 | ||
24 | 6 | 10 | ||
25 | 6 | 8 | ||
26 | 6 | 8 | ||
27 | 5 | 9 | ||
28 | 5 | 10 | ||
29 | 5 | 9 | ||
30 | 4 | 10 | ||
Average number of raters selecting ratings correctly: | 8.6 |
aThe clinical cases were written to produce these “correct” ratings. The word “correct” is used here for clarity, but these are more precisely termed “target” ratings because of the inevitable possibility that the clinical cases were themselves in some way misleading