Table 7.
Overview of the three main strategies for plant gene editing: ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas9.
Technology | Acronym | Type | System components | Mechanism of action | Sensitivity to methylation | Off-target effects | Design difficulty | Scaling up for library production | Studies in tomato and grape |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zinc finger nuclease | ZFN | Protein-DNA | Zinc finger DNA binding domain fused with an endonuclease (usually FokI); specific recognition of 3 bp sequences | A DNA-cutting/DNA-grabbing-based system, able to recognize target genes | Yes | High | Difficult | No (custom protein selection for each gene) | Hilioti et al., 2016 |
Transcription activator-like effector nuclease | TALEN | Protein-DNA | Endonuclease (usually FokI) catalytic domain fused to Xanthomonas spp. DNA binding domain of transcription activator-like effectors. Composed by 33–35 amino acid (aa) multiple repeats containing a repeat variable diresidue (RDV; usually, the aa 12 and 13) | Same as ZFN | Yes | Low | Medium | Possible but complicate | Lor et al., 2014 |
Clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated | CRISPR/Cas9 | RNA-DNA | 20 nt crRNA fused to tracrRNA and Cas9 endonuclease | A DNA-cutting protein associated to a guided RNA which can specifically recognize target genes | No | Low | Easy | Easy (generation of 20 nt adapter/s for each gene) | Brooks et al., 2014; Ron et al., 2014; Čermák et al., 2015; de Toledo Thomazella et al., 2016; Jacobs and Martin, 2016; Ito et al., 2015; Klap et al., 2016; Pan et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016; Ren et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016 |
Technical characteristics and a survey of all the studies described, to date, in tomato and grape are also provided.