Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 8;7(5):1439–1450. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.040659

Table 6. Vault bone length comparisons.

Spry1 on C57 Spry2 on 129 Spry2 on C57
+/+ −/− Ratio +/+ −/− Ratio +/+ −/− Ratio
Frontal length (M21–M26) 7.14 (0.31) 6.45 (0.58) 1.11a 7.00 (0.23) 7.03 (0.42) 1.00 7.41 (0.15) 6.50 (0.34) 1.14a
Parietal length (M26–M27) 3.96 (0.47) 3.52 (0.34) 1.12a 4.37 (0.19) 4.04 (0.47) 1.09a 3.88 (0.11) 3.96 (0.47) 0.99
Frontal and parietal length (M21–M27) 11.02 (0.39) 9.86 (0.75) 1.12a 11.29 (0.31) 10.91 (0.66) 1.04 11.21 (0.12) 10.33 (0.35) 1.09a
Vault width (R25–L25) 6.05 (0.14) 5.89 (0.14) 1.03a 5.90 (0.21) 6.31 (0.41) 0.94a 6.04 (0.09) 5.99 (0.29) 1.01

The first two columns of each section include mean raw lengths of midline vault linear distances (mm), followed by SDs in parentheses, for control (+/+) and homozygote null mutant (−/−) specimens of the three most severely affected background/genotype combinations. The third column in each section includes ratios of +/+ length over −/− length.

a

Ratio value is significantly different from 1.0 (P = 0.05) based on an EDMA (Euclidian Distance Matrix Analysis) FORM difference permutation test.