Table 6.
Adjusted logistic regression of clients very satisfied with family planning services and client’s correct knowledge of method’s protection from STIs
| Variable | Category | Very satisfied Model Ia | Very satisfied Model IIa | Correct knowledgeb | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | C.I. | OR | C.I. | OR | C.I. | ||
| Clients age (ref. = 14–24) | 25–39 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.6 | 0.9 | 0.6–1.6 | 1.4 | 0.9–2.2 |
| 40–58 & don’t know | 1.9 | 0.8–4.4 | 1.8 | 0.7–4.3 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.3 | |
| Client’s education (ref. = secondary or more) | No education | 2.1* | 1.2–3.9 | 2.1* | 1.2–3.8 | 0.7 | 0.4–1.2 |
| Primary & post primary | 2.0* | 1.0–3.7 | 2.0* | 1.1–3.7 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.5 | |
| Fee paid for service (ref. = 1000 or more) | 0–9 | 1.3 | 0.6–3.0 | 1.4 | 0.6–3.1 | ||
| 10–499 | 0.9 | 0.4–2.0 | 1.0 | 0.4–2.2 | |||
| 500–999 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.6 | 1.0 | 0.6–1.8 | |||
| Waiting time (ref. = 2 hours or more) | No wait | 5.4* | 1.2–24.0 | 5.7* | 1.3–25.2 | ||
| Less than half hour | 0.8 | 0.4–1.4 | 0.8 | 0.4–1.4 | |||
| Half hour to one hour | 1.0 | 0.5–2.1 | 1.1 | 0.5–2.2 | |||
| One hour to 2 hours | 1.2 | 0.5–3.0 | 1.2 | 0.5–2.8 | |||
| Client status (ref. = returning client) | New client | 1.2 | 0.6–2.4 | 1.1 | 0.6–2.2 | 0.7 | 0.5–1.1 |
| Contraceptive method used (ref. = IUD or implants) | Pills | 1.1 | 0.5–2.7 | 1.1 | 0.5–2.6 | 1.1 | 0.6–2.0 |
| Progestin-only injection | 1.4 | 0.7–2.9 | 1.4 | 0.6–3.0 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.6 | |
| Client left with method (ref. = no) | Yes | 3.9** | 1.5–10.4 | 3.7** | 1.4–10.0 | ||
| Provider category (ref. = midwife and other) | Nurse or nurse assistant | 1.0 | 0.6–1.9 | 1.1 | 0.6–1.9 | 2.1** | 1.3–3.2 |
| Provider years of education (ref. = 17+) | 6–12 | 3.6* | 1.2–10.3 | 2.9* | 1.0–8.3 | 1.7 | 0.8–3.7 |
| 13–16 | 3.8*** | 2.2–6.6 | 3.4*** | 1.9–6.1 | 1.1 | 0.8–1.7 | |
| Provider training in family planning in the past 24 months (ref. = no) | Yes | 1.5 | 0.9–2.6 | 1.5 | 0.9–2.5 | 1.7** | 1.2–2.5 |
| Provider activities supervised (ref. = none) | 1–5 | 1.0 | 0.6–2.0 | 1.2 | 0.7–2.3 | 0.7 | 0.4–1.2 |
| 6 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.6 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.7 | 1.1 | 0.7–1.9 | |
| Provider has a job description (ref. = no) | Yes | 1.1 | 0.6–1.9 | 1.1 | 0.6–1.9 | 1.0 | 0.6–1.5 |
| Provider salary type (ref. = none) | Monthly or daily salary | 2.0 | 0.9–4.5 | 2.0 | 0.9–4.6 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.5 |
| No regular salary but other compensation | 0.9 | 0.4–1.8 | 0.9 | 0.4–1.8 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.5 | |
| Counseled on how to use method (ref. = no) | Yes | 1.3 | 0.8–2.2 | 1.3 | 0.8–2.2 | ||
| Counseled on side effects of methoda (ref. = yes) | No | 2.6** | 1.5–4.6 | ||||
| Counseled on when to returna (ref. = yes) | No | 2.0* | 1.2–3.5 | ||||
| Counseled on whether method protects from STI (ref. = no) | Yes | 1.2 | 0.6–2.3 | ||||
| Health facility type (ref. = hospital/health center) | Health post | 1.5 | 0.8–2.8 | 1.4 | 0.8–2.6 | 0.7 | 0.5–1.1 |
| Locality (ref. = urban) | Rural | 0.9 | 0.5–1.7 | 1.0 | 0.5–1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8–2.0 |
| Region (ref. = Northern) | Dakar | 5.3*** | 2.1–12.9 | 4.8*** | 1.9–11.9 | 3.0** | 1.4–6.3 |
| Thiès | 2.8* | 1.2–6.6 | 2.5* | 1.1–5.9 | 1.9 | 1.0–3.7 | |
| Central | 10.7*** | 3.6–32.3 | 11.5*** | 3.7–36.3 | 1.3 | 0.6–2.6 | |
| East | 5.2* | 1.4–19.0 | 4.6* | 1.3–16.6 | 2.0 | 0.8–4.9 | |
| South | 12.3*** | 3.4–45.4 | 13.9*** | 3.7–52.5 | 4.2*** | 1.9–9.2 | |
| General structure equipment composite index (ref. = low) | Medium | 0.9 | 0.5–1.7 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.5 | ||
| High | 1.0 | 0.5–2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5–1.9 | |||
| Pseudo-R b | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.09 | ||||
For client satisfaction outcome, Model I includes the variable for counseled on side effects, and
Model II includes the variable on counseled on when to return. aUsers of pill, injectable, IUD, and implant. bAll users
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Note: Bold values indicate a p-value<0.05