Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;8(4):2868–2877. doi: 10.1039/c6sc05580j

Fig. 3. Structural analysis of CaM thioamide variants. Top Left: potential hydrogen bonding interactions for stabilization observed in ValS 136 and GluS 139 substitutions. Right: neutral (ValS 142 and AlaS 147) and destabilizing (TyrS 138, GluS 140, and PheS 141) substitutions. Destabilization of CaM by PheS 141 and TyrS 138 and may be due to disruption in the packing of the helix. GluS 140 disrupts hydrogen bond acceptance without making a compensatory hydrogen bond donor interaction. Increased C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O···N distance (3.1 Å) in the turn of the helix at ValS 142 may allow for better accommodation of the thioamide sulfur. AlaS 147 is the penultimate C-terminal residue and only serves as a hydrogen bond donor. Structures rendered from PDB entry ; 1QX5 chains D (yellow) and R (green) and from PDB entry ; 1CFD (orange, only N-terminal region shown). 34,35 .

Fig. 3