Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2016 May 13;77(5):2048–2056. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26268

Table 1.

Summary of SAR, Average Temperature, and Peak Temperature at steady state (SS) for Selected Configurations in the Reference Scenario

Configuration avgSAR (W/kg)
psSAR10g (W/kg)
avgT at SS (°C)
pT at SS (°C)
Mother Fetus Amni. Mother Fetus Amni. Mother Fetus Amni. Mother Fetus Amni.
CP values from Hand et al (6) for comparison 2.0 1.05 2.74 > 20.0 5.3 13.1 > 37.3 37.6 39.6 > 38.9 38.7 40.1
CP 2.0 1.13 4.94 29.6 7.4 8.0 37.3 37.5 37.6 39.7 38.4 38.3
WC mother (SAR) 2.0 0.52 2.34 39.9 6.3 8.6 37.1 37.3 37.4 39.3 37.8 37.8
Best shim, ROI: fetus (min. CV(B1+)) 2.0 1.62 6.62 18.5 9.45 10.1 37.4 37.6 38.0 39.7 39.6 39.6
WC fetus 2.0 2.77 11.0 22.7 21.3 22.6 37.3 37.8 38.3 41.0 40.8 41.0
Uncertainty interval for the fetus in the line above (bold) (2.47; 3.11) (19.5; 23.3) (37.5; 38.1) (39.8; 42.4)

Note: The uncertainty interval for fetal worst-case exposure (bold) is stated on the last row. The first row states the values from Hand et al (6), in which the sixth month of gestation NICT model was used with homogenous tissue properties for the fetus. avgT, average temperature; pT, peak temperature; SS, steady state; WC, worst-case.