Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 23;7:350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00373-8

Table 1.

The score and rank of the comprehensive tomato quality parameters calculated in a PCA of all the treatments.

Treatment Q1 Q2 Q Rank
W1F1 0.305 0.708 1.014 4
W1F2 −1.335 −0.304 −1.639 7
W1F3 −3.796 0.010 −3.786 9
W2F1 2.158 1.687 3.844 1
W2F2 0.090 −1.195 −1.105 6
W2F3 −2.227 −0.659 −2.886 8
W3F1 3.784 −1.023 2.761 2
W3F2 1.662 −0.508 1.153 3
W3F3 −0.640 1.284 0.644 5

The treatments are noted as W1, 100% ET 0; W2, 75% ET 0; W3, 50% ET 0; F1, 240N−120P2O5−150K2O kg ha−1; F2, 180N−90P2O5−112.5K2O kg ha−1; and F3, 120N−60P2O5−75K2O kg ha−1.