Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;7:430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00586-x

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Retrieved effective surface impedances of the metasurfaces for both the upper bound (red curves) and lower bound (black curves) cases. (b) Retrieved effective surface impedances of the metasurfaces for l = 0.7 μm with R s = 128 Ω (black curves), l = 0.8 μm with R s = 83 Ω (blue curves), and 0.9 μm with R s = 40 Ω (red curves). (c) Calculated absorption spectral responses of the metasurface absorbers for l = 0.7 μm with R s = 128 Ω (black curves), l = 0.8 μm with R s = 83 Ω (blue curves), and 0.9 μm with R s = 40 Ω (red curves) with identical vacuum gap distances of d = 2.5 μm. The inset shows the simulated surface current density distribution on the metasurface with l = 0.7 μm at the resonance wavelength. (d) Simulated absorption spectral responses of the metasurface absorbers for l = 0.7 μm with R s = 128 Ω (black curves), l = 0.8 μm with R s = 83 Ω (blue curves), and 0.9 μm with R s = 40 Ω (red curves) with identical vacuum gap distances of d = 2.5 μm.