Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 7;68(8):2055–2063. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw430

Table 4.

Effects of pollination and temperature treatments on per-plant reproductive success

Experiment or site Pollination treatments Seed number Seed mass (g)
Control Stress Control Stress
Sonning Bees 19.8 ± 12.3 13.1 ± 6.6 9.3 ± 6.4 6.3 ± 3.1
None 18.6 ± 7.8 9.4 ± 5.3 8.8 ± 5.0 5.2 ± 3.3
Harborne Bees 26.4 ± 10.8 17.6 ± 8.2 13.2 ± 5.3 8.4 ± 4.2
None 16.2 ± 6.3 6.2 ± 5.0 9.2 ± 4.1 3.8 ± 3.3
Model parameter
Temp P<0.001
Poll:temp P=0.034 P=0.685
Poll:site P=0.003 P=0.022
Temp:site P=0.517 P=0.242
Poll:temp:site P=0.445 P=0.959
Flight cages Bees 56.0 ± 16.8 34.9 ± 9.9 33.6 ± 7.7 25.5 ± 7.6
None 29.2 ± 10.3 16.4 ± 5.7 18.4 ± 5.6 10.0 ± 4.8
Bees+tripping 56.4 ± 24.7 32.1 ± 8.9 31.1 ± 15.1 24.4 ± 5.6
None+tripping 55.3 ± 20.7 39.4 ± 11.5 29.4 ± 10.2 25.6 ± 7.3
Model parameter
Temp P=0.005 P=0.027
Poll P<0.001 P<0.001
Poll:temp P=0.883 P=0.847

Presented values are the observed mean ±SD, and P-values are from likelihood ratio tests (see Supplementary Table S1 for more information).

For the flight cage experiment, means and SDs were calculated from data already aggregated across flight cages and cabinets. Abbreviations: poll, pollination treatment, temp, temperature treatment, interactions are indicated by ':'. Lower level interactions and individual parameters are not included if in a higher level interaction.

Bold significance values are significant to P<0.05.