Table 1. Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with OTSC.
Patient | Sex | Age | Location of perforation | Cause | Perforation size | Use of twin grasper | Technical success | Clinical success |
1 | M | 81 | Rectosigmoid junction | Diagnostic colonoscopy | 10 mm | No | Yes | No (surgical intervention) |
2 | F | 73 | Colorectal anastomoses | Therapeutic colonoscopy (EMR) | 10 mm | Yes | Yes | Yes |
3 | F | 73 | Rectum | Therapeutic colonoscopy (ESD) | 20 mm | Yes | Yes | Yes |
4 | F | 63 | Sigmoid | Therapeutic colonoscopy (EMR) | 15 mm | Yes | Yes | Yes |
5 | F | 71 | Sigmoid | Therapeutic colonoscopy (EMR) | 10 mm | No | Yes | Yes |
6 | F | 43 | Rectosigmoid junction | Diagnostic colonoscopy | 10 mm | Yes | Yes | No (ureteral obstruction) |
7 | F | 92 | Sigmoid | Diagnostic colonoscopy | 10 mm | No | Yes | Yes |
8 | F | 78 | Cardia | Therapeutic gastroscopy (EMR) | 10 mm | No | Yes | Yes |
9 | F | 56 | Duodenal bulb | Diagnostic EUS | 10 mm | No | Yes | Yes |
10 | F | 78 | Duodenal bulb | Diagnostic EUS | 10 mm | No | Yes | Yes |
11 | F | 93 | Duodenum | Diagnostic EUS | 10 mm | No | Yes | Yes |
F = female, M = male
EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography