Table 4.
Scaffold 3.
# | -R1 | -R2 | -R3 | IC50 (95% CI), μM | Hill slope (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3aa |
![]() |
-Br | -H | 58 (37 – 90) | −1.3 (−1.9, −0.6) |
3ab |
![]() |
![]() |
-H | inhibitorb | |
3ac |
![]() |
![]() |
-H | 8 (4–16) | −0,9 (−1.4, −0.5) |
3ad |
![]() |
![]() |
-H | 23 (19–28) | n.dc |
3ae |
![]() |
-H |
![]() |
inactivea | |
3af |
![]() |
![]() |
-H | inhibitorb | |
3ag |
![]() |
-H | -H | weak inhibitora |
modulatory effect estimated from three concentrations only;
4-parameter logistic model curve could not be fitted.
Hill coefficient could not be calculated with significant accuracy (within 3 units).