Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Feb 7;103:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.02.005

Table 7.

Scaffold 5B.

R1 R2 IC50 (95% CI), μM Hill slope (95% CI)
5bg -H graphic file with name nihms853926t113.jpg weak inhibitora
5bh -H graphic file with name nihms853926t114.jpg 136 (83 – 223) −0.8 (−1.2 ; −0.5)
5bi 4-CH3 graphic file with name nihms853926t115.jpg inactivea
5bj 4-CH3 graphic file with name nihms853926t116.jpg inactivea
5bk 4-CH3 graphic file with name nihms853926t117.jpg inactivea
5bl 4-CH3 graphic file with name nihms853926t118.jpg inactivea
5bm 4-OCH3 graphic file with name nihms853926t119.jpg inactivea
5bn 4-NH2 graphic file with name nihms853926t120.jpg inactivea
5bo graphic file with name nihms853926t121.jpg graphic file with name nihms853926t122.jpg inactive
5bp graphic file with name nihms853926t123.jpg graphic file with name nihms853926t124.jpg weak inhibitora
5bq 2-CH3; 5-NO2 graphic file with name nihms853926t125.jpg inactive
a

modulatory effect estimated from three concentrations only;

b

4-parameter logistic model curve could not be fitted.

c

Hill coefficient could not be calculated with significant accuracy (within 3 units).