. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Nov 12;50(6):648–656. doi: 10.1002/eat.22648

Table 4.

Logistic regressions examining associations among unresponsive feeding practices, child overweight, and child eating behaviors in children of HW, OB, and BED parents.

	Multivariate Logistic Regression: Unresponsive Feeding Practices and Parent Group				IV: BED group membership	IV: OB group membership	IV: Restriction	IV: Pressure-to-eat

	χ ²	df	p	Nagelkerke R²	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Child Overeating	25.23	4	<.001	.126	2.19* (1.04-4.61)	1.15 (0.54-2.48)	1.63** (1.23-2.15)	0.65** (0.48-0.88)
Child Binge-eating	27.84	4	<.001	.191	4.64** (1.82-11.82)	0.93 (0.27-3.19)	2.07** (1.31-3.27)	0.81 (0.54-1.20)
Child Overweight/Obesity	25.95	4	<.001	.105	1.30 (0.70-2.40)	2.21** (1.27-3.84)	1.43*** (1.18-1.74)	0.78* (0.63-0.97)

Note. N=331. Logistic regression models used all BED, OB, and HW parents. Significant odds ratios (*p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001) greater than 1 indicate increased likelihood of child eating behavior/weight; odds ratios between 0 and 1 indicate decreased likelihood of child eating behavior/weight.