Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 12;46(6):1275–1288. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0564-5

Table 2.

Linear probability models predicting social exclusion

Rejection (n = 4237) Isolation (n = 4408) Victimization (n = 4795)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Immigrant status
 Swedish majority Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Second generation European .10 (.04)* .09 (04)* .12 (04)** .03 (.03) .02 (.03) .03 (.03) −.05 (.02)* −.05 (.02)* −.05 (.02)*
 Second generation non-European .07 (03)* .04 (.03) .08 (.03)* −.01 (.01) −.01 (.01) −.01 (.02) −.05 (.01)** −.04 (.01)** −.05 (.02)**
 First generation European .18 (.06)** .16 (.06)** .19 (.06)** .01 (.03) .01 (.03) .01 (.03) −.01 (.03) −.01 (.03) −.01 (.03)
 First generation non-European .12 (.04)** .07 (.04)+ .11 (.05)* .08 (.03)** .08 (.03)** .08 (.03)** .01 (.03) .01 (03) .01 (.03)
Gender-female −.05 (.02)* −.05 (.02)* .01 (.01) .01 (.01) −.01 −.01 (.01)
Cognitive ability −.04 (.01)*** −.04 (.01)***
Other family structure −.02 (.01) −.02 (.02) −.01 (.01) −.01 (.01) .03 (.01)* .03 (.03)*
Household income −.02 (.01)* −.02 (.01)* −.01 (.01) −.01 (.01) .01 (.01) .01 (.01)
Parental education −.03 (.01)** −.03 (.01)** −.01 (.01)* −.01 (.01)* .01 (.01) .01 (.01)
Immigrant density—categorical
 Low 0–20 % Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Moderate 21–49 % −.04 (.02) −.01 (.01) .01 (.02)
 High 50–100 % −.12 (.03)*** −.01 (.01) .01 (.02)
Number of classmates .01 (.01)+ −.01 (.01)* −.01 (.01)

Note + p < .09; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001