Table 1.
Line or cultivar | 2014 Yangzhou, China, field |
2015 Ottawa, ON, Canada, greenhouse |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Infection spikelets (%) |
Infection spikelets (%) |
|||
Injection | Natural | Injection I | Injection II | |
RE21 | 4.53 ± 0.25∗∗ | 4.80 ± 0.42∗∗ | 5.23 ± 0.44∗∗ | 5.00 ± .028∗∗ |
RE62 | - | - | 98.88 ± 0.12 | 97.97 ± 0.22 |
T182 | 9.67 ± 0.28 | 8.70 ± 0.47 | 10.09 ± 0.13 | 10.34 ± 0.21 |
8801 | 5.10 ± 0.41 | 4.47 ± 0.37 | 5.10 ± 0.27 | 4.77 ± 0.32 |
Sumai 3 | 5.00 ± 0.17 | 4.57 ± 0.12 | 4.77 ± 0.21 | 4.90 ± 0.18 |
An 8455 | 66.53 ± 0.11 | 66.73 ± 0.18 | - | - |
Roblin | - | - | 97.92 ± 0.14 | 98.75 ± 0.17 |
∗∗Significantly different from both of the two susceptible controls, An 8455 and Roblin, at p < 0.01 (ANOVA).