Table 4.

Developmental changes in females and males for gain and loss in each block.

	GLMMs. Relative Risk. 95% CI
	Females		Males
	First follow-upa	Second follow-upa	First follow-upa	Second follow-upa
Net Gain	1.12 [1.07, 1.18]∗∗∗	1.20 [1.13, 1.27]∗∗∗	1.30 [1.25, 1.43]∗∗∗	1.33 [1.25, 1.43]∗∗∗
1° Block	0.99 [0.94, 1.04]	0.99 [0.95, 1.06]	1.02 [0.97, 1.09]	1.02 [0.95, 1.08]
2° Block	1.02 [0.97, 1.07]	1.04 [0.99, 1.10]	1.05 [0.99, 1.12]	1.04 [0.98, 1.11]
3° Block	1.05 [0.99, 1.10]	1.07 [1.02, 1.13]∗∗	1.08 [1.02, 1.15]∗∗	1.09 [1.02, 1.16]∗∗
4° Block	1.03 [0.98, 1.08]	1.06 [1.00, 1.11]∗	1.09 [1.03, 1.15]∗∗	1.10 [1.03, 1.17]∗∗
5° Block	1.04 [0.99, 1.09]	1.07 [1.01, 1.12]∗	1.06 [1.00, 1.12]∗	1.07 [1.00, 1.14]∗
Net Loss	0.95 [0.90, 0.99]∗	0.88 [0.84, 0.93]∗∗∗	0.98 [0.92, 1.04]	0.98 [0.91, 1.05]
1° Block	1.00 [0.95, 1.05]	1.00 [0.95, 1.05]	1.00 [0.94, 1.06]	0.98 [0.92, 1.05]
2° Block	1.00 [0.95, 1.05]	0.98 [0.93, 1.03]	1.03 [0.98, 1.10]	1.04 [0.98, 1.11]
3° Block	1.01 [0.96, 1.06]	0.98 [0.93, 1.04]	0.99 [0.94, 1.05]	0.99 [0.93, 1.05]
4° Block	0.98 [0.93, 1.03]	0.95 [0.90, 1.01]	0.99 [0.93, 1.05]	0.99 [0.93, 1.06]
5° Block	0.96 [0.91, 1.00]	0.95 [0.90, 0.99]∗	0.92 [0.87, 0.98]∗	0.94 [0.88, 1.01]

GLMMs, generalized linear mixed models. CI, confidence intervals. ^aReference category = baseline. Values higher than one with significant intervals are indicative of a good performance in gain whereas in loss values below one reflect less frequency bias. ^∗p < 0.05, ^∗∗p < 0.01, ^∗∗∗p < 0.001.