Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;7:944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01062-2

Figure 5.

Figure 5

CFA elicits comparable levels of mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in GPR55 KO and WT mice. Levels of CFA-evoked mechanical hypersensitivity do not differ between GPR55 KO and WT mice (a). CFA does not elicit mechanical hypersensitivity in the paw contralateral to CFA administration (b). Paw diameters were similar in the CFA-injected (ipsilateral) paw in GPR55 KO and WT mice (c). Paw diameters were elevated in GPR55 KO relative to WT mice in the paw contralateral to CFA administration on day 7 only (d). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8–9 per group). ***p < 0.001 vs. WT, 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc. In an independent replication, GPR55 KO and WT mice develop similar levels of mechanical (e), and thermal hypersensitivity (g) following i.pl. CFA. Mechanical (f), and thermal (h) hyperalgesia do not develop in the paw contralateral to CFA administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group). 2-way ANOVA.