Skip to main content
. 2017 May 15;8:194. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00194

Table A3.

Characteristics of turning strategies in right paretic (RP) patients.

Turning strategy
1 2 3 4
Recent RP n−3 n = 0 n−2 N = 0
No. of external steps, mean (SD) 2.7 (0.6) 3.5 (0.7)
Turn duration (s), mean (SD) 3.3 (0.7) 4.9 (0.4)
Angular velocity (°/s), mean (SD) 62.7 (4.5) 38.0 (0.7)
Timed up-and-go test (TUG) (s), mean (SD) 10.8 (0.4) 19.5 (0.6)
New functional ambulation categories (NFAC) (/8) ≤5 33 (1) 100 (2)
≥6 66 (2) 0
Lower-limb Fugl-Meyer subscale (FM) (/34) <20 0 0
20–30 33 (1) 100 (2)
>30 66 (2) 0
Turning pattern I 0 0
II 100 (3) 100 (2)
III 0 0
Chronic RP n = 4 n = 0 n = 3 n = 5
No. of external steps, mean (SD) 3.5 (1.3) 3.7 (0.6) 3.4 (1.1)
Turn duration (s), mean (SD) 3.9 (1.0) 5.2 (1.0) 6.2 (2.7)
Angular velocity (°/s), mean (SD) 55.5 (13.3) 36.9 (7.1) 36.6 (16.5)
TUG (s), mean (SD) 16.4 (5.9) 16.6 (4.8) 27.4 (10.7)
NFAC (/8) ≤5 25 (1) 33 (1) 80 (4)
≥6 75 (3) 66 (2) 20 (1)
FM (/34) <20 25 (1) 0 40 (2)
20–30 75 (3) 66 (2) 60 (3)
>30 0 33 (1) 0
Turning pattern I 25 (1) 0 25 (1)
II 25 (1) 100 (3) 25 (1)
III 50 (2) 0 50 (2)

Data are no. (%) unless indicated.

The data for left paretic patients are not shown because 85% performed strategy 4.

Significant difference between all the columns and 1–4 = significant difference between two columns (p < 0.05).

NA, not applicable for qualitative parameters.

One turn could not be classified as any pattern.