Table 1.
Stimulation | TMS Parameter | Medication condition | Baseline 1 | Baseline 2 | Baseline 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cathodal tDCS | MEP | 0.3 mg | 0.97 ± 0.13 | 1.01 ± 0.19 | 0.93 ± 0.13 |
1.0 mg | 0.94 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.13 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | ||
Placebo | 0.97 ± 0.13 | 1.06 ± 0.45 | 0.97 ± 0.12 | ||
%MSO | 0.3 mg | 57.17 ± 14.48 | 57.08 ± 14.57 | ||
1.0 mg | 56.08 ± 14.15 | 56.67 ± 14.06 | |||
Placebo | 56.50 ± 13.57 | 56.75 ± 14.07 | |||
Anodal tDCS | MEP | 0.3 mg | 0.95 ± 0.08 | 0.95 ± 0.13 | 1.00 ± 0.11 |
1.0 mg | 0.99 ± 0.16 | 0.88 ± 0.15 | 0.93 ± 0.13 | ||
Placebo | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.15 | 0.99 ± 0.13 | ||
%MSO | 0.3 mg | 56.83 ± 13.11 | 57.25 ± 13.07 | ||
1.0 mg | 57.08 ± 14.37 | 57.83 ± 14.83 | |||
Placebo | 56.75 ± 14.00 | 57.17 ± 13.82 | |||
PAS10 | MEP | 0.3 mg | 0.94 ± 0.10 | 1.05 ± 0.40 | 1.04 ± 0.15 |
1.0 mg | 0.99 ± 0.10 | 0.86 ± 0.12 | 0.90 ± 0.08 | ||
Placebo | 1.01 ± 0.14 | 0.93 ± 0.18 | 0.97 ± 0.10 | ||
%MSO | 0.3 mg | 57.08 ± 11.22 | 57.17 ± 11.63 | ||
1.0 mg | 57.75 ± 11.95 | 58.25 ± 11.93 | |||
Placebo | 56.67 ± 12.35 | 57.08 ± 12.38 | |||
PAS25 | MEP | 0.3 mg | 0.92 ± 0.11 | 0.91 ± 0.21 | 0.95 ± 0.12 |
1.0 mg | 0.97 ± 0.10 | 0.97 ± 0.19 | 0.98 ± 0.14 | ||
Placebo | 1.01 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 0.94 ± 0.11 | ||
%MSO | 0.3 mg | 56.83 ± 12.34 | 57.00 ± 12.45 | ||
1.0 mg | 57.17 ± 11.85 | 57.58 ± 11.95 | |||
Placebo | 57.25 ± 11.42 | 57.58 ± 11.42 |
Shown are the mean MEP amplitudes ± S.D. and stimulation intensity (percentage of maximum stimulator output, %MSO) means ± S.D. of baselines 1, 2 and 3. The intensity of TMS was adjusted to elicit MEPs with peak-to-peak amplitude of ~1 mV (baseline 1). A second baseline (baseline 2) was recorded three hours after varenicline or placebo intake to determine the impact of the drug on cortical excitability and adjusted if necessary (baseline 3). RM-ANOVAs revealed no significant differences between %MSO values and MEP amplitudes.