Skip to main content
. 2017 May 8;7:1542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01606-6

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of localization performance by theoretical calculation and numerical simulation. (a) Comparison of relative localization precision for the objectives with different NAs. (b) Comparison of localization precision for different cameras under different signal levels. (c) Comparison of localization precision between the low-cost SMLM and the standard SMLM under different signal levels using simulated images. 1000 images were simulated for each data point. Here, the standard SMLM uses TIRF objective (100X, NA1.49) and EMCCD camera with a pixel size of 160 nm.