Table 2. Summary statistics for genetic data CTCAE grading for COMT, TPMT and ACYP2 CTCAE criteria using worse ear in cases of asymmetric hearing loss.
COMT |
Grade 0 (n=26) |
Grade 1 (n=8) |
Grade 2 (n=41) |
Grade 3 (n=35) |
Grade 4 (n=6) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs9332377 | CC | 18 (22.5%) | 4 (5%) | 28 (35%) | 27 (33.8%) | 3 (3.8%) | ||
CT | 7 (21.1%) | 3 (9.4%) | 12 (37.5%) | 7 (21.9%) | 3 (9.4%) | |||
TT | 1 (25%) | 1 (25%) | 1 (25%) | 1 (25%) | 0 (0%) | |||
rs4646316 | CC | 18 (26.1%) | 4 (5.8%) | 24 (34.8%) | 19 (27.5%) | 4 (5.8%) | ||
CT | 6 (14.3%) | 4 (9.5%) | 14 (33.3%) | 16 (38.1%) | 2 (4.8%) | |||
TT | 1 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (66.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
TPMT | ||||||||
rs12201199 | AA | 18 (19.1%) | 7 (7.4%) | 33 (35.1%) | 30 (31.9%) | 6 (6.4%) | ||
AT | 7 (33.3%) | 1 (4.8%) | 8 (38.1%) | 5 (23.8%) | 0 (0%) | |||
TT | 1(100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
rs1142345 | TT | 22 (22%) | 7 (7%) | 34 (34%) | 31 (31%) | 6 (6%) | ||
TC | 3 (21.4%) | 1 (7.1%) | 6 (42.9%) | 4 (28.6%) | 0 (0%) | |||
CC | 1(100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
rs1800460 | CC | 24 (22.6%) | 7 (6.6%) | 37 (34.9%) | 32 (30.2%) | 6 (5.7%) | ||
CT | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) | 4 (44.4%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | |||
TT | 1(100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
ACYP2 | ||||||||
Grade 0 (n=31) |
Grade 1a (n=17) |
Grade 1b (n=15) |
Grade 2a (n=5) |
Grade2b (n=10) |
Grade 3 (n=32) |
Grade 4 (n=5) |
||
rs1872328 | GG | 29 (27.4%) | 16 (15.1%) | 10 (9.4%) | 5 (4.7%) | 10 (9.4%) | 31 (29.2%) | 5 (4.7%) |
GA | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 4 (66.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
AA | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |