Skip to main content
. 2017 May 1;13(5):e1006755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006755

Table 1. Empirical type- 1 error rates and power to detect an outlier study for M at threshold α = 0.05.

# Studies # Variants Type- 1 error Power
30 50 0.050 98.9
25 0.054 98.1
10 0.056 39.9
15 50 0.033 99.2
25 0.034 97.6
10 0.039 40.3
10 50 0.024 98.7
25 0.033 96.7
10 0.025 35.7

GWAS meta-analysis simulation experiments each based on 1000 replicates. Studies were equally weighted (i.e. SE(β coefficients) = 0.08). Variant effect sizes for studies in the type-1 error analysis were sourced from an L-shaped distribution (S2 Table). In the power analysis, variant effect sizes for studies showing typical effects were sourced from S2 Table whilst effect sizes for variants in the outlier study were calculated as a multiple of the typical effect size. For example, effect sizes for variants in an outlier study 2-fold-stronger than studies showing typical effects would be computed as (2 x ({0.04, 0.12, 0.2, 0.28, 0.4}, σ = 0.10).