Table 3.
Outcome | Effect | Effect Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Correctly identified the results of their baseline DXA | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | −0.145 | (−0.178, −0.111) | <0.001 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | −0.154 | (−0.194, −0.113) | <0.001 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | −0.15 | (−0.190, −0.110) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.118 | (0.087, 0.148) | <0.001 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.088 | (0.052, 0.125) | <0.001 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | −0.151 | (−0.191, −0.111) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.141 | (0.100, 0.181) | <0.001 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.115 | (0.067, 0.163) | <0.001 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | −0.051 | (−0.112, 0.01) | 0.099 | ||
On guideline concordant pharmacotherapy | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | 0.144 | (0.112, 0.176) | <0.001 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | −0.073 | (−0.111, −0.034) | <0.001 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | −0.073 | (−0.112, −0.035) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | −0.016 | (−0.043, 0.01) | 0.233 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | −0.005 | (−0.035, 0.025) | 0.737 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | −0.073 | (−0.111, −0.034) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | −0.028 | (−0.063, 0.006) | 0.110 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | −0.020 | (−0.061, 0.021) | 0.335 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | 0.029 | (−0.025, 0.083) | 0.289 | ||
Osteoporosis related satisfaction | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | −0.127 | (−0.201, −0.053) | 0.001 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | −0.053 | (−0.145, 0.039) | 0.256 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | −0.046 | (−0.137, 0.046) | 0.328 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.266 | (0.194, 0.338) | <0.001 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.041 | (−0.05, 0.132) | 0.378 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | −0.046 | (−0.138, 0.045) | 0.323 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.282 | (0.185, 0.38) | <0.001 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.060 | (−0.059, 0.178) | 0.322 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | −0.036 | (−0.180, 0.109) | 0.628 | ||
Osteoporosis specific knowledge | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | −0.656 | (−0.724, −0.588) | <0.001 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | −0.474 | (−0.556, −0.392) | <0.001 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | −0.473 | (−0.555, −0.391) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.021 | (−0.036, 0.079) | 0.463 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.023 | (−0.042, 0.088) | 0.482 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | −0.472 | (−0.554, −0.39) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | −0.007 | (−0.082, 0.068) | 0.856 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | −0.011 | (−0.100, 0.077) | 0.801 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | 0.067 | (−0.048, 0.183) | 0.253 | ||
Osteoporosis self-efficacy exercise | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | 0.006 | (−0.066, 0.077) | 0.873 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | 0.166 | (0.082, 0.250) | <0.001 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | 0.166 | (0.082, 0.250) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | −0.010 | (−0.068, 0.048) | 0.734 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.066 | (0.000, 0.132) | 0.050 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | 0.166 | (0.082, 0.250) | <0.001 | |
Intervention vs. Control | −0.013 | (−0.090, 0.063) | 0.729 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.062 | (−0.028, 0.152) | 0.177 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | 0.008 | (−0.109, 0.125) | 0.892 | ||
Osteoporosis self-efficacy diet | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | −0.032 | (−0.102, 0.038) | 0.368 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | 0.082 | (−0.006, 0.17) | 0.067 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | 0.082 | (−0.006, 0.17) | 0.069 | |
Intervention vs. Control | −0.018 | (−0.079, 0.044) | 0.574 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.045 | (−0.024, 0.114) | 0.203 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | 0.081 | (−0.007, 0.169) | 0.071 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.006 | (−0.074, 0.086) | 0.877 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.074 | (−0.020, 0.168) | 0.121 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | −0.057 | (−0.180, 0.066) | 0.365 | ||
Patient activation | Model 1 | Race Black vs. White | −0.009 | (−0.080, 0.062) | 0.796 |
Model 2 | Race Black vs. White | 0.112 | (0.024, 0.201) | 0.013 | |
Model 3 | Race Black vs. White | 0.114 | (0.025, 0.202) | 0.012 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.05 | (−0.016, 0.116) | 0.141 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.029 | (−0.049, 0.107) | 0.467 | ||
Model 4 | Race Black vs. White | 0.114 | (0.026, 0.203) | 0.012 | |
Intervention vs. Control | 0.033 | (−0.055, 0.122) | 0.463 | ||
Site KP vs. UAB | 0.01 | (−0.094, 0.114) | 0.850 | ||
Site (KP) * Intervention | 0.037 | (−0.095, 0.169) | 0.584 |
Model 1 includes race only (Black vs. White)
Model 2 includes race and covariates measured at baseline
Model 3 includes race, intervention, plus covariates measured at baseline
Model 4 includes race, intervention, interaction between intervention and site (KP vs. UAB), plus covariates measured at baseline
Baseline covariates include, site (KP vs. UAB), age (continuous), education, comorbidity (COPD, depression and breast cancer), self-assessed health status (using self-reported health status, continuous), heath habits (current smoker, former smoker and drinker), bone health (history of DXA, history of fracture and history of osteoporosis treatment), health literacy (continuous), health numeracy (continuous), study DXA, fracture risk, gender of provider, physician, and provider specialty.