Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;11:264. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00264

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) 3D meshes indicating the distance to the closest vertex point from the reconstructed model to the ground truth model obtained from FaceSCAN3D. Difference values are plotted on the ground truth model. Vertex point distances are color coded, ranging from 0 mm to 2.95 mm (the 95th percentile). (B) Descriptive curves for downsampling image count (Dimg) and image resolution (Dres). The blue and green lines indicate the quadratic fitting curves for the respective data. Dotted and dash-dotted lines indicate the respective 95% confidence interval of the fitting curves. X-axis values represent the relative downsampling rates corresponding to Table 1. Top left plots the MPC density relative to the full-resolution model, top right likewise for DPC density, bottom left for overall time consumption relative to the full-resolution model and bottom right for the average deviation to the full-resolution model in mm. (C) An example showing the area that needed to be removed in order to make the meshes covering a comparable area for each downsampling step for image count. (D) Additionally loss of vertex points in order to make the meshes covering a comparable area for each downsampling step (Dimg). The dashed area indicates the not interpretable result of having a negative loss of information as a function of downsampling. At 50% downsampling, 7.8% of spatial information was lost.