Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 18;245(6):1091–1104. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2662-3

Table 2.

The leaf pressure–volume curve (PV) parameters of well-watered (WW), transient water deficit (TD), and sustained water deficit (SD) vines after the acclimation period: osmotic potential at full turgor (π 100), mean bulk modulus of elasticity (ε), water potential at turgor loss point (ΨTLP), and relative water content at turgor loss point (RWCTLP)

Treatment π 100 (MPa) ε (MPa) ΨTLP (MPa) RWCTLP (%)
WW −1.02 ± 0.03a 6.07 ± 0.55a −1.08 ± 0.03b 92.06 ± 0.90a
TD −1.07 ± 0.04a 8.16 ± 0.78a −1.17 ± 0.04ab 90.91 ± 1.24a
SD −1.10 ± 0.05a 7.17 ± 0.71a −1.31 ± 0.06a 88.21 ± 2.68a

Values are mean ± SE (n = 9). Different letters within a column indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05) by Tukey Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test