Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;25(5):1542–1554. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4399-0

Table 4.

Surgical technique and risk of revision ACL surgery

HR ADJUSTED HRa
Group HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Comparison group No. of eventsb Reference group No. of eventsb
TT-non-anatomic (n = 1296) n = 40 TP-reference (n = 6685) n = 162 0.704 0.497–0.998 0.049 0.694 0.490–0.984 0.041
TT-anatomic (n = 2159) n = 77 0.942 0.717–1.239 n.s. 0.944 0.718–1.241 n.s.
TT-partial anatomic (n = 1516) n = 48 0.723 0.522–1.001 n.s. 0.759 0.548–1.051 n.s.
TP-anatomic (n = 4036) n = 146 1.285 1.027–1.607 0.028 1.310 1.047–1.640 0.018
All landmarks (n = 9398) n = 252 No landmarks (n = 831) n = 27 1.387 0.928–2.072 n.s. 1.392 0.931–2.081 n.s.
TP drilling (n = 12,440) n = 380 TT-drilling (n = 5110) n = 167 1.390 1.157–1.670 <0.001 1.399 1.163–1.682 <0.001

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, TP transportal, TT transtibial

aMultivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for patient sex, patient age and meniscal or chondral injury

bEvent = revision ACL surgery