Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 17;57:28. doi: 10.1186/s40529-016-0145-7

Table 6.

Variation in biomass production of Cyclocarya paliurus under different treatments of shading and provenance (mean ± SD, samples collected in October 20, 2011)

Treatment Biomass production (g)
Root Stem Leaf Total
A1B1 57.9 ± 4.00cd 62.9 ± 7.08cd 21.6 ± 2.72a 142.5 ± 13.8bc
A1B2 47.8 ± 5.42cd 46.4 ± 4.70bc 21.9 ± 2.48a 112.6 ± 12.6b
A1B3 104.5 ± 9.50d 129.3 ± 13.76d 82.7 ± 8.75b 316.5 ± 32.02d
A2B1 20.1 ± 2.08bc 30.8 ± 2.36b 11.5 ± 1.73a 62.5 ± 6.18ab
A2B2 36.9 ± 3.22bcd 40.4 ± 3.25bc 25.8 ± 2.05a 103.1 ± 8.53ab
A2B3 59.8 ± 5.50 cd 106.0 ± 10.27d 71.3 ± 6.67b 237.2 ± 22.46cd
A3B1 9.4 ± 1.48a 11.3 ± 0.82a 5.6 ± 0.47a 26.4 ± 2.77a
A3B2 17.2 ± 1.92b 12.6 ± 0.77a 10.3 ± 0.74a 40.3 ± 3.44ab
A3B3 12.6 ± 2.18b 10.7 ± 0.98a 8.8 ± 0.46a 32.2 ± 2.59a

Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments for the same category according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05)