Table 2.
Comparisons of meiotic TII stage between the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars
| Cultivar | Tetraploid | Diploid | t a | t b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of cell | Abnormal cell frequency (%) | Micronucleus to cell ratio | Sum of cell | Abnormal cell frequency (%) | Micronucleus to cell ratio | |||
| Qianwei 2# | 132 | 30.30 | 0.5000 | 112 | 5.36 | 0.0536 | 4.9645** | 7.6190** |
| Jinku 2# | 107 | 25.23 | 0.4486 | 107 | 4.67 | 0.0467 | 4.2171** | 6.8096** |
| Chuanqiao 1# | 140 | 18.57 | 0.3857 | 159 | 4.40 | 0.0440 | 3.9015** | 7.3160** |
| Liuqiao 1# | 194 | 28.87 | 0.4897 | 124 | 4.03 | 0.0403 | 5.4857** | 8.4178** |
| Average | 25.05 | 0.4494 | 4.45 | 0.0445 | ||||
t a Indicate the t value of abnormal cell frequency (%)
t b Indicate the t value of micronucleus to cell ratio
** Indicate significance of the difference at the p = 0.01 level