Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2016 Aug 30;47(2):227–241. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002026

Table 4.

Concentration of risk of observed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the top 5th percentile of predicted PTSD, total sample and stratified by subgroups (n = 378)a

Sensitivityb
Positive predictive valuec
% PTSD (S.E.) % PTSD (S.E.)
Total 44.5 (18.0) 20.4 (9.5)
Age
 25+ years 34.0 (13.6) 11.8 (1.3)
 <25 years 52.9 (26.3) 32.4 (20.7)
Gender
 Male 56.4 (24.3) 29.4 (19.6)
 Female 27.9 (23.8) 10.9 (8.8)
Education
 High or high-average 50.3 (20.3) 39.5 (16.4)
 Low or low-average 22.4 (14.9) 3.9 (0.5)
a

Based on weighted data pooled across the six surveys in high-income countries. See Table note a in Table 2 for a description of the weighting. Ten-fold cross-validation involves dividing the sample into 10 separate random subsamples of equal size, estimating the model in each of the 10 separate 90% subsamples created by deleting one of the 10 subsamples, and applying predicted values based on each set of coefficients only to the remaining 10% of the sample. Replicated cross-validation involves repeating the cross-validation process some number of times (20 times in the current application), with a different random split of the sample into 10 equal-sized subsamples each time. Sensitivity and positive predictive value were calculated separately in each of these 200 subsamples and averaged to produce the results reported here.

b

Sensitivity = proportion of all PTSD found among the 5% of respondents with highest predicted probabilities based on the final model.

c

Positive predictive value = prevalence of PTSD among respondents in the row who are among the 5% in the total sample with the highest predicted probabilities based on the final model.