Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May 24;23(8):2438–2445. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5275-3

TABLE 2.

Factors associated with successful ablation

Successful ablation (n = 66) Unsuccessful ablation (n = 21) p-Value
MRI status 0.050
 Residual enhancement 14 (60.9) 9 (39.1)
 No residual enhancement 52 (78.8) 12 (18.8)
HR status 0.99
 Negative 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0)
 Positive 63 (75.9) 20 (24.1)
Tumor grade 0.15
 Low 26 (88.7) 4 (13.3)
 Intermediate 23 (65.7) 12 (34.3)
 High 10 (71.4) 4 (28.6)
Tumor size, cm 0.10
 <1.0 15 (93.8) 1 (6.3)
 ≥1.0 51 (71.8) 20 (28.2)
MRI status for tumor size <1.0 0.31
 Residual enhancement 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0)
 No residual enhancement 11 (100.0) 0
MRI status for tumor size ≥1.0 0.076
 Residual enhancement 10 (55.6) 8 (44.4)
 No residual enhancement 41 (77.4) 12 (22.6)

Successful ablation or MRI residual disease Unsuccessful ablation and MRI no residual disease

Tumor size, cm 0.11
 <1.0 16 (100.0) 0
 ≥1.0 59 (78.7) 12 (21.3)