Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):224–229. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0126

Table 1. UHRF1 gene expression values regarding the demographic and selected clinicopathological parameters in urinary bladder TCC versus control patient’s samples and differences between the urinary bladder TCC subgroups.

Patients groups Demographic and clinicopathological patient subgroups Patients number n (%) UHRF1 expression (mean±SE) Difference vs. control group (p-value) Difference between the two subgroups (p-value)
TCC Total 70 (100) 1.47±0.25 0.1826 /

Gender Male 61 (87.14) 1.53±0.28 0.3090 0.4719
Female 9 (12.86) 1.02±0.34 0.0814
Smoking history No 23 (32.86) 1.56±0.48 0.2332 0.7546
Yes 47 (67.14) 1.42±0.29 0.2664
Tumor number Solitary 41 (58.57) 1.75±0.36 0.0348* 0.0927
Multiple 29 (41.43) 1.06±0.30 0.9177
Tumor size (cm) ≤3 38 (54.29) 1.09±0.25 0.4268 0.4330
>3 32 (45.71) 1.91±0.45 0.1275
Grades Low 41 (58.57) 0.72±0.11 0.9060 0.0090**
High 29 (41.43) 2.53±0.52 0.0057**
Stages Non-muscle invasive 53 (75.71) 1.09±0.24 0.6222 0.0305*
Muscle invasive 17 (24.29) 2.65±0.62 0.0087**
Outcome Good 44 (62.86) 0.93±0.20 0.4654 0.1127
Poor 26 (37.14) 2.37±0.54 0.0410*

Control Total 40 (100) 0.58±0.03 / /

Gender Male 34 (85.00) 1.58±0.03 / 0.6359
Female 6 (15.00) 1.60±0.05 /

*and**, p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, versus control; SE = standard error.