Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;1:2055217315620935. doi: 10.1177/2055217315620935

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients.

Patients (n) Female (%) Age (years) κ FLCs in CSF κ index Lambda index
Control group
 Group 1: NPH 41 11 (26.8) 75.72 (40–87) 0.16 (0.10–0.22) 1.62 (0.99–2.27) 1.28 (0.93–1.68)
 Group 2: NIND 15 10 (66.7) 39.11 (15–71) 0.12 (0.10–0.20) 3.37 (1.95–7.05) 1.35 (0.96–1.90)
 Group 3: IND 14 9 (64.3) 44.77 (30–75) 0.13 (0.04–0.20) 2.86 (1.47–7.00) 1.10 (0.81–2.71)
 Total 70 30 (42.9) 61.69 (15–87) 0.15 (0.10–0.20) 1.96 (1.13–3.56) 1.27 (0.93–1.69)
Case group
 Group 4: CIS 77 60 (77.9) 35.26 (15–62) 0.73 (0.13–3.2) 35.61 (4.48–132.73) 3.81 (1.49–16.95)
 Group 5: RRMS 29 17 (58.6) 34.81 (17–57) 1.45 (0.52–6.67) 88 (33.96–295.13) 5.43 (2.01–19.40)
 Total of patients 176 107 (60.8) 45.70 (15–87)

The patients were divided in five groups: the control group was classified in three subgroups: normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), other non-inflammatory neurologic disease (NIND) different from NPH and other inflammatory neurologic disease (IND) different from multiple sclerosis (MS); case group: Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Data are shown as the mean and the range for age; kappa free light chains (κFLCs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), κ index and lambda index were found to be non-parametric after applying the Shapiro-Wilk test, so we calculated the median level and the interquartile range (IQR).