Table 3.
Plausibility of patient experience surveys: limiting factors and potential foci for sensegiving dialogue
Factors inhibiting plausibility of interpretations favouring quality improvement | Foci for potential sensegiving dialogue | |
---|---|---|
1. Views of patients | Not disinterested evaluators | Nature of doctors’ personal engagement with patients; psychometric bases of validity/reliability |
Incompetent evaluators | Nature of doctors’ personal engagement with patients; survey administration process; instructions given to patients on survey instruments | |
2. Views of surveys | Difficulties of interpreting feedback | Facilitated feedback for individual doctors/groups of doctors, embedded within wider local change programmes; additional information on feedback material (e.g. benchmarking data) |
Lack of contextual sensitivity | Potential for development/validation of tailored survey instruments for different care settings | |
Anxiety regarding negative feedback | Nature of support provided to individual doctors concerned about negative feedback | |
Risk of raising patient expectations | Potential to limit frequency of survey administration to minimum necessary, except where raising patient expectations is intended |