Table 4. Comparison (Chi-square and Binomial tests) between the amount of scraping (SCRA) behaviors in MARK and SHAM conditions: The frequency of SCRA behavior towards both left and right cheeks is reported in the two conditions (SHAM and MARK 1, 2).
MARK 1 (left and right)* |
SHAM (left and right)* |
Chi Square (Binomial test)§ | |
Julia | 64 | 13 | p < 0.0001; χ2 = 32.46 (p < 0.0001; z = 5.7) |
Calippo | 9 | 7 | p = 0.8065; χ2 = 0.06 (p = 0.8036; z = 0.25) |
Gina | 30 | 11 | p = 0.0049; χ2 = 7.9 (p = 0.0043; z = 2.81) |
Betsie | 18 | 7 | p = 0.0455; χ2 = 4 (p = 0.0433; z = 2) |
MARK 2 (left and right)* |
SHAM (left and right)* |
Chi Square (Binomial test)§ | |
Julia | 18 | 13 | p = 0.4708; χ2 = 0.52 (p = 0.4731; z = 0.72) |
Calippo | 13 | 7 | p = 0.2636; χ2 = 1.25 (p = 0.2632; z = 1.12) |
Gina | 16 | 11 | p = 0.4386; χ2 = 0.6 (p = 0.4421; z = 0.77) |
Betsie | 21 | 7 | p = 0.014; χ2 = 6.04 (p = 0.0125; z = 2.46) |
MARK 1 (left)# |
SHAM (left)# |
Chi Square (Binomial test)§ | |
Julia | 41 | 8 | p < 0.0001; χ2 = 20.9 (p < 0.0001; z = 4.57) |
Calippo | 6 | 6 | p = 1; χ2 = 0 (p = 1; z = 0) |
Gina | 16 | 5 | p = 0.0291; χ2 = 4.76 (p = 0.0266; z = 2.18) |
Betsie | 8 | 1 | p = 0.0455; χ2 = 4 (p = 0.0391; z = n.a.) |
MARK 2 (right)# |
SHAM (right)# |
Chi Square (Binomial test)§ | |
Julia | 8 | 5 | p = 0.5839; χ2 = 0.3 (p = 0.5811; z = 0.55) |
Calippo | 6 | 1 | p = 0.1311; χ2 = 2.28 (p = 0.125; z = n.a.) |
Gina | 6 | 6 | p = 1; χ2 = 0 (p = 1; z = 0) |
Betsie | 8 | 6 | p = 0.7773; χ2 = 0.08 (p = 0.7905; z = 0.27) |
* The total of SCRA behaviors directed to both cheeks of the face (left + right) in MARK 1 vs SHAM and MARK 2 vs SHAM
# The total of SCRA behaviors directed to the left cheek (MARK 1 vs SHAM left) or the right cheek (MARK 2 vs SHAM right)
§ Chi-Square "Goodness of Fit" Test and Binomial test (between brackets). Binomial test has been included because two comparisons have expected frequencies lower than 5.0