Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0177118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177118

Table 3. Associations between case control status, HbA1c and hand pain, function and stiffness.

Crude B (95% CI) Age and sex adjusted B (95% CI) Fully adjusted B (95% CI) Fully adjusted, +adjusted for hand complaints B (95% CI)
Outcome: Hand pain (0–20 scale)a
 Exposed case (ref.: non-exposed) 2.65* (1.49–3.81) 2.88* (1.76–3.99) 2.78* (1.65–3.91) 1.59* (0.34–2.83)
 HbA1c in 2015 1.42* (0.87–1.95) 1.51* (0.99–2.02) 1.43* (0.91–1.95) 1.06* (0.50–1.62)
 Glycaemic burden 2.16* (1.05–3.28) 2.19* (1.19–3.19) 2.00* (0.77–3.19) 1.76* (0.49–3.03)
Outcome: Hand disability (0–36 scale)a
 Exposed case (ref.: non-exposed) 5.04* (3.11–6.97) 5.65* (3.88–7.43) 5.30* (3.48–7.12) 3.77* (1.75–5.80)
 HbA1c in 2015 2.30* (1.45–3.16) 2.55* (1.78–3.32) 2.40* (1.60–3.20) 1.84* (0.92–2.76)
 Glycaemic burden 3.00* (1.20–4.80) 3.15* (1.57–4.72) 3.15* (1.37–4.94) 2.84* (0.99–4.70)
Outcome: Hand stiffness (0–4 scale)b
 Exposed case (ref.: non-exposed) 1.90* (1.27–2.52) 2.07* (1.42–2.73) 2.00* (1.33–2.67) 1.39* (0.65–2.12)
 HbA1c in 2015 0.93* (0.65–1.21) 0.98* (0.71–1.26) 0.92* (0.63–1.21) 0.72* (0.40–1.03)
 Glycaemic burden 0.65* (0.27–1.03) 0.76* (0.32–1.21) 0.67* (0.10–1.24) 0.50 (-0.14–1.15)

a Linear regression analyses,

b ordinal regression analyses. Cases exposed to long-term type 1 diabetes (N = 96), non-exposed are healthy controls (N = 69). Fully adjusted analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education status and waist circumference. Fully adjusted +adjusted for hand complaints were additionally adjusted for the presence of the hand complaints carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, Dupuytren's contracture and limited joint mobility on a 0–4 scale. Glycaemic burden; mean time-weighted HbA1c (available for exposed cases only), B; unstandardized Beta estimate, CI; confidence intervals.

* implies p<0.05.