Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;146(19):194102. doi: 10.1063/1.4983277

TABLE VII.

CC2 excitation energies computed with the present approach (in eV), the percentage of VNOs and NAFs dropped, and computation times (in min) using the default thresholds with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set for big molecules.

Molecule Number of atoms Number of basis functions State Character ωCC2 Dropped VNOs Dropped NAFs tCISa t𝐉¯ b tCC2c
Flv(a) 51 2001 S1 ππ* 2.750 60.9 82.1 15.5 81.6 3.7
S2 ππ* 2.995 60.8 82.0 81.6 3.6
S3 n,σπ* 3.339 61.1 82.1 81.6 3.4
S4 ππ* 3.613 60.9 82.0 81.6 3.5
Dyad 53 2051 S1 ππ* 3.063 61.4 82.7 15.4 84.1 3.5
S2 CT 3.373 61.7 82.8 84.1 3.5
S3 ππ* 3.506 61.2 82.6 84.1 3.4
S4 CT 3.826 61.2 82.7 84.1 3.5
Bisimide derivative 60 2346 S1 ππ* 2.543 61.5 82.5 24.6 179.3 7.0
S2 ππ* 3.438 61.5 82.6 178.7 6.7
S3 ππ* 3.707 61.5 82.6 179.2 6.4
S4 ππ* 3.793 61.5 82.6 178.9 6.4
Flv(b) 78 2829 S1 ππ* 2.603 63.8 83.3 53.9 416.3 12.9
S2 ππ* 2.978 63.9 83.3 416.2 12.9
S3 n,σπ* 3.279 64.0 83.4 416.2 13.0
S4 ππ* 3.329 63.8 83.3 415.9 13.0
D21L6 98 3412 S1 CT 2.622 65.2 84.4 42.8 1093.2 29.1
S2 ππ* 3.442 65.1 84.3 1092.9 30.0
Average 62.3 82.9
Maximum 65.2 84.4
Minimum 60.8 82.0
a

Average wall time for a CIS iteration using a multi-state, integral-direct algorithm.

b

Average wall time for the construction of the 𝐉¯ integral list. The calculation of the MP2 density is distributed equally among the excited states, that is, t𝐉¯=tCIS(D)+t𝐌𝐏𝟐/n+t𝐖+tInt, where tCIS(D), tMP2, and tW are the wall times required for the evaluation of the CIS(D) and MP2 density matrices and the W matrix, respectively, n stands for the number of excited states, and tInt is the wall time required for the integral transformations.

c

Average wall time for a CC2 iteration.