Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;7:1962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01990-z

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of 2D downscaling on false negative and positive results. Percentage of false (negative and positive) results comparing 2D views and 3D tracking in terms of average peak speed, average angular speed, average peak angular speed, average distance from the stimulus, and wall following. The percentage of false results was computed by dividing the number of false negative (resp. positive) results with the corresponding number of valid comparisons in the 3D data. In particular, if the number of significant differences in 3D were Ds and non-significant Dn, then the percentage of false negatives for a given view was computed as (number of false negatives)/Ds, and correspondingly the percentage of false positives was computed as (number of false positives)/Dn. Data from Fig. 3 were pooled to quantify the proportion of false results obtained from 2D top (red bar) and front (blue bar) views. False negative results are identified with dark red and blue, and false positive results are identified with light red and blue.